Gender: Male Age: 45 Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 205
Posted: Tue 23 Oct 2007, 7:48 Post subject:
Hello There.
I think it's not such a lucky comparison. First of all because of the IS.
A better comparisson is the 400L F5.6 Canon compared to 300 + 1.4 Nikon.
I'll explain this.
(Nikon cropfactor) 1,5 * 300 * 1,4 = 630 mm
(Canon cropfactor) 1,6 * 400 = 640 mm
Both are without IS and I suppose the Canon combination is much faster and sharper.
On the other hand... The D200 is a great camera with very good software attached.
(I'm not sure, but my hunch is, that the IS slowes the AF)
greetings
p.s. foregive me the hastened "English" _________________ Canon DSRL: ouder spul
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Posted: Tue 23 Oct 2007, 7:48 Post subject:
